Type C disputable evidence

otseng wrote: Sun Jun 04, 2023 7:01 am There are some claims made by shroud proponents that I have not used in my arguments as evidence as these are disputable evidence. But for completeness I’ll just mention them:

– Pollen found on shroud
– Flowers on shroud
– Coin over eyes
– Sponge, nails on the shroud
– Pendant hanging on neck
– Writings on the shroud

All of these are considered to be a type C evidence according to the ShroudScience group, which is comprised of 2 dozen leading shroud researchers.

Type C refers to facts that were evidenced by some researchers but that are not universally
accepted; therefore they can help in formulating new hypotheses, they can not be used to test a new
hypothesis.

https://shroud.com/pdfs/doclist.pdf

https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1125950#p1125950