Some papers discussing image projection from a 3D body to a shroud draped over the body to account for image distortions: Though this image appears to be anatomically reasonable, there are some second-order characteristics which indicate that this may not be so: broadening of hips, elongation of arms and fingers, lateral displacement of hair away …
In 1978 the Vatican allowed a group of scientists called STURP (Shroud of Turin Research Project) — most of who were deeply religious — to examine the shroud. That said, it’s unfortunate that almost all of those that made up this group were deeply religious, and many were not specialised in the field they investigated. …
Question: What is your number one reason why you don’t believe this cloth could possibly be the burial cloth of Jesus Christ? Perhaps surprisingly, I’m not going to say carbon dating. There is a far more powerful argument than any single piece of evidence. It is the consensus of expert opinion. http://www.sillybeliefs.com/shroud.html First, there is …
There is no way the blood stains could’ve been painted on after the image was imprinted on the cloth. It’s because there is no image under the blood stains. That means the blood was on the cloth first and then the image was formed. And if you think about, it must’ve happened this way if …
First, it’s generally accepted it is real blood on the shroud. From a forensic point of view, the blood marks are macroscopically consistent with blood, except for the color which is too red for centuries-old blood.The “blood” is real blood: it does contain all the molecular components of blood (iron, amount of iron consistent with …
John 19:40 (KJV) Then took they the body of Jesus, and wound it in linen clothes with the spices, as the manner of the Jews is to bury. https://simple.uniquebibleapp.com/bible … /19#v19_40 Yes, the shroud was folded in half and covered the entire back and front of the body. But, the shroud cloth was originally two …
Another thing about the hands. The fingers appear to not simply be a visual depiction of the hand, but an x-ray depiction. It more closely matches what we would see of an x-ray image than a photographic image. And this is not only for the hands, but other parts of the body as well. The …
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Chri … aphael.jpg Another interesting thing about the hands – one hand extends longer than the other. Why would that be the case? It was because his right shoulder was dislocated when he fell while carrying the cross. If it’s a forgery, why and how could the artist depict is so well that modern medical …
https://shroudphotos.com/gallery/page/7/ Another difference between the shroud and other medieval depictions of Jesus is the placement of the nail. In other depictions, the nail goes through the palm of the hand. All paintings and sculptures during that time portray it this way. But, the shroud is unique in that it has the nail going through the …
Another very interesting aspect to the body image is it is a result of discoloration on the topmost fibers. The image does not go all the way through the cloth as one would expect if it was painted on. There is also no cement material found to indicate it was a painting. During the 1978 …