Fuller Theological Seminary has a fairly balanced view on inerrancy from an evangelical point of view.
This doctrinal commitment is built on a submission to the authority of Scripture, which must stand as teacher and judge of all that we think and do. It both inspires and corrects our doctrine and our conduct. It must always be clear that for us as evangelicals, the Scriptures outrank all of our doctrinal statements, even statements as carefully written and as strongly believed as those in the Statement of Faith.Where inerrancy refers to what the Holy Spirit is saying to the churches through the biblical writers, we support its use. Where the focus switches to an undue emphasis on matters like chronological details, precise sequence of events, and numerical allusions, we would consider the term misleading and inappropriate.
Its dangers, when improperly defined, are
1. that it implies a precision alien to the minds of the Bible writers and their own use of the Scriptures;
2. that it diverts attention from the message of salvation and the instruction in righteousness which are the Bible’s key themes;
3. that it may encourage glib and artificial harmonizations rather than serious wrestling with the implication of biblical statements which may seem to disagree;
4. that it leads those who think that there is one proven error in the Bible (however minor), to regard its whole teaching as subject to doubt;
5. that too often it has undermined our confidence in the Bible by a retreat for refuge to the original manuscripts (which we do not possess) whenever problems cannot otherwise be resolved;
6. that it prompts us to an inordinate defensiveness of Scripture which seems out of keeping with the bold confidence with which the prophets, the apostles, and our Lord proclaimed it.
https://www.fuller.edu/About/Mission-an … and-Teach/
Where I would quibble with Fuller is they have multiple meanings to the term inerrant – one that applies to “what the Holy Spirit is saying” and to “undue emphasis”. Instead of trying to save the term by having multiple definitions, I submit the term should no longer be used.
https://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=985874#p985874