The cubit was the unit of length used in the Ancient Near East. The cubit is an ancient unit of length based on the distance from the elbow to the tip of the middle finger. It was primarily associated with the Sumerians, Egyptians, and Israelites. The term cubit is found in the Bible regarding Noah’s …
C14 in fossil fuels is not the only evidence of a young earth. Another evidence is soft tissue remains in dinosaur fossils. A 70-million-year-old Tyrannosaurus rex fossil has yielded soft tissue, including blood vessels and perhaps even whole cells, U.S. researchers reported on Thursday. “Tissue fragments from a Tyrannosaurus rex femur are shown at left, …
Science firmly accepts the validity of Radiocarbon dating for organic material and (e.g) potassium argon dating for mineral remains. One either accepts the science or not. Well, let’s take a look at this… Accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS), a sensitive radiometric dating technique, is in some cases finding trace amounts of radioactive carbon-14 in coal deposits, …
I will now summarize my arguments why the existence of the tower of Babel and it resulting in the origin of subsequent languages is a better explanation than science. The Bible claims all the subsequent languages of the world originated from a single source at the tower of Babel. Gen 11:1-9 (ESV) 1 Now the …
Diogenes wrote: ↑Thu Jan 27, 2022 3:46 pm Not tools?! That is just silly. Of course they are tools. If it’s a tool, then what was it designed for? Yes, we know that an automobile, arrowheads, axes and scrapers have functions. We know what is their purpose. But, the Acheulean biface remains a mystery. As …
We have examples now of objects found worldwide that have varying forms, from modest to highly artistic, that purely have symbolic value. A great example of this is the cross. The cross is ubiquitous and is the most commonly found artifact in the world. We see this also in the Acheulean biface. The cross comes …
I argue they are not tools, but more likely something that has symbolic value (like an art or religious relic). Though many Acheulean biface are modest in appearance, there is a percentage that are quite artistic, even to modern standards. “They are a potent manifestation of an early and continuous human interest in perfection of …
TRANSPONDER wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 12:14 am Would you care to explain the relevance of this in relation to validating the Bible? The chipped flint is the most basic tool of mankind. I have a theory floating in the back of my mind, but before I reveal that, we need to reiterate the facts …
Another interesting artifact that is found common around the world is the Acheulean biface (or hand axe). I had posted this in Quora… A very interesting object is the oldest surviving shaped tool used by man, the Acheulean biface (or hand axe). Dates for its use varies but generally spans from 2.6 million years ago …
Diogenes wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 3:00 pm Not knowing the all the details of the origin and development of every language does not mean there is no ‘naturalistic explanation’ for them. I think your source can be summarized by: “These issues and many others are undergoing lively investigation among linguists, psychologists, and biologists.” https://www.linguisticsociety.org/resou …
Read more “No naturalistic explanation for origin of languages”