McCulloch wrote: otseng wrote: And this confirms the prediction that there is more genetic diversity in females than males. Did I miss something? Has it been established that there is more genetic diversity in human females than in males? What does this mean? It is referring to the time of the flood as I first …
nygreenguy wrote: 400,000 thousand year old sculpture http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3047383.stm Here is a picture of it: It is dubious that this is a man made sculpture. The articles also states: “[Mr Bednarik] has effectively presented all the information necessary to show this is a naturally weathered rock,” Professor Ambrose told BBC News Online. 200,000 year old home …
nygreenguy wrote: otseng wrote: Evolution has abiogenesis as its starting point, which is untestable. Or if you believe in panspermia instead, that is also untestable. All we need to show is it was possible, and that has been done several times over. What has been done several times over? You tell me. Does human evolutionary …
Abraxas wrote: – All humanity traces lineage to one man and one woman. Instead, we find that the mitochondrial Eve lived 200,000 years ago but the comparative Adam lived a mere 60,000-90,000 years ago. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y-chromosomal_Adam http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrial_Eve Firstly, as the two did not exist during the same time frame, they certainly could not have produced offspring …
GrumpyMrGruff wrote: However, the authors point out that this is consistent with the current understanding of primate phylogeny. It’s only a problem if one assumes quick fixation for the ERV – that it’s inherited by every member of the population before speciation. In this case, the authors propose that some members of the ancestral species …
nygreenguy wrote:You propose an untestable causal agent. That right there kicks it out of science. Evolution has abiogenesis as its starting point, which is untestable. Or if you believe in panspermia instead, that is also untestable. Predictions: – All humanity traces lineage to one man and one woman. How does this seperate itself from evolution? …
Human Creation Model: – God created the first man and woman (tens of thousands of years ago). – God created the first humans distinct from the animals. – All humans arose from the first couple. – A global flood occurred. Noah and his sons and all their wives were the only humans (total of 8) …
Grumpy wrote: Predictions=brain size smaller, height shorter, weight less, less well developed walking(as opposed to grasping)feet, shorter lifespans, fewer and cruder tools as you go backward in time. The average height and size of Homo heidelbergensis is larger than humans. Cranal capacity is also quite large. “Homo heidelbergensis had a larger brain when compared to …
nygreenguy wrote: Category number 1 (Hierarchical Taxonomic Classification) is a good example of a pattern that can, of course, be explained by special creation. Linnaeus did just that. But Darwin a century later explained the same set of ordered relationships between organisms as being the result of divergent evolution and shared ancestry. More important, though, …
Goat wrote:you have to show that ERV is in other great apes but not in chimps.. that has not been shown to be true. Even if it is shown, it would be simply explained as a deletion in the chimp line. At the risk of repeating ad infinitum, here are the list of homo sapien …