An interesting feature of the shroud image is it is missing depictions of certain things. “It is important to note there are no images of the sides of the body or the top of the head” https://blog.asnt.org/the-mysteries-of- … -of-turin/ The shroud would’ve covered the top of the head since it was one piece. Yet, there …
Shroud skeptics continually claim the Turin shroud is a medieval forgery, a cunningly crafted work by a mysterious artist. “We can be virtually certain that the Shroud of Turin is a hoax that was originally created in France in around the 1350s AD by an artist trained in the Gothic figurative style as part of …
If the shroud was created by an artist, perhaps the best genre to classify it would be realism — or most specifically, hyperrealism or photorealism. “Hyperrealism is a genre of painting and sculpture resembling a high-resolution photograph. Hyperrealism is considered an advancement of photorealism by the methods used to create the resulting paintings or sculptures.” …
When viewing the shroud with light at the back of the shroud, one can view the scorch marks, water stains, and blood marks. But, the body image is not visible, revealing that it does not block any light. One can also see the bands and threads in the cloth which reveals how the shroud was …
https://www.behance.net/gallery/41994987/jesus If the shroud image was created by an artist, he could not have brushed paint on it because there are no brush strokes. “It is true to say that there are no signs of brushstrokes on the shroud.” https://www.abc.net.au/science/articles … 667644.htm Another indication it could not have been painted on by a brush is …
I mentioned one curious effect of the shroud image is that you cannot discern the image when you are close to it. The reason for this is the image uses the halftone effect. Halftone is the reprographic technique that simulates continuous-tone imagery through the use of dots, varying either in size or in spacing, thus …
Cosmology (and physics) have started to resort to non-natural explanations because naturalistic explanations are not viable. These are not done by religious right-wing nuts, but by bona fide scientists. The only way to get around this is to equivocate and redefine what is natural. Something outside of our universe is not natural. Something in another …
Read more “Scientists are already invoking non-natural explanations”
brunumb wrote: ↑Wed Jan 04, 2023 11:49 pm Perhaps it is the algorithm that creates the 3D information based on shading present in the original image that is used. The VP8 is not adding any additional information, but simply decoding what is on the shroud. Further, there are other methods besides the VP8 to generate …
The VP-8 Image Analyzer was produced in 1972 by Pete Schumacher and was primarily used by US governmental research institutions. The VP8 Image Analyzer is an analog computer produced by Pete Schumacher of Interpretations Systems Incorporated (ISI) in 1972. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VP8_Image_Analyzer In 1976, the 3-D qualities of the shroud image was discovered using the VP-8 Image …
If the sides were around the body they should show the sides in image and extended to twice the size, shouldn’t they? That also is a clue to how the image got formed. There are many possible ways to project a 3-D body onto a 2-D surface. This is akin to having several ways the …